Okay.
My final question is maybe a bit beyond navigable waters specifically, but it's the whole process, because you alluded to it, of environmental approvals.
We have the port of Vancouver, with some of the extensions that are going on. I was in Shanghai a year or two ago, and I saw, I think, the Donghai Bridge...32 kilometres to the port at Yangshan. I think it was three or four years from concept to completion. After three or four years, we would still be in the preliminary environmental assessment period, I presume.
I'm not suggesting that China's approach to environmental assessment is the right approach. I'm the critic for the Pacific gateway strategy, and one of the concerns we have is maintaining our competitiveness in terms of expansion of our port facilities, whether it's Prince Rupert, which we've done, or in the port of Vancouver--combined port with Fraserport--and ensuring that we have the capability to handle the volumes that are there.
Otherwise, if we don't show we have that capacity, we will have those shippers bypassing us and automatically going south to U.S. ports. It's really important that the ports of Vancouver and Prince Rupert have that capacity, as the gateway to Canada from the Asia Pacific, in a significant market that's growing.
The comparison to the navigable waters is as you're dovetailing.... I think the question Mr. Masse asked earlier related to how you coordinate these to try to minimize delays, to ensure you're doing the job that has to be done, but that you don't end up with sequential considerations, you end up with parallel considerations, which I think Ms. Scharf talked about. That's what I would hope we would look at.