You're very correct. From an overall perspective, you have the two approvals: the environmental assessment approval and the Navigable Waters Protection Act approval. In reality, if an environmental assessment approval is negative, the project doesn't proceed. That is to say, for more clarity, it could be very good from a navigable perspective, but if the environmental aspect isn't there, then it would not proceed. So from an environmental concern, I think my colleagues here have explained that these processes would still continue anyway.
From our perspective, these changes that are suggested would certainly improve our ability to carry out our work and at the end of the day would be better for basically all concerned, whether environmentalists or whoever. It would establish a more modern structure, a better way to look at what is navigable and what is not, and not to have a structure in place that could be considered as prohibitive, or even not necessary in some cases.
I don't know if you want to add something to this, David.