I'll move on to another point. When a line is going to be abandoned, or a lease is up, and say a short line doesn't take over, there is a compensation formula to municipalities for, I believe, a three-year period of $10,000 a mile or something. That would have helped the municipality to improve the transportation or road infrastructure, I assume, but over a period of time those roads get beat up pretty badly. Is there something there we could consider that would increase the length of time that railways would be responsible for this, like increased compensation to municipalities? Could you live with that as well?
On November 29th, 2007. See this statement in context.