Thank you very much. My question is for Ms. Morgan.
The Railway Association of Canada sent us a copy of the letter that it had sent to the Senate following the appearance of your association before the Senate committee. It contained harsh words towards forestry producers, among others, saying that you had little evidence that would allow you to say that forestry producers and forestry products would be the captives of a single rail transportation service provider.
For my part, I think that you are right, but I am having some trouble. It will be necessary to counter what they are saying, because their comments were based on the OECD report produced in 2005, which deals with all the rail transportation systems throughout the world. The report states that Canada is an example because there are two networks. I will quote the report:
[...] the two dominant rail networks operate over parallel tracks and are capable of providing a wide range of similar services [...]
So that means there is competition. But the evidence you have provided shows that that is not true everywhere; Mr. Ballantyne told us that. It is untrue, namely, in the forestry sector. I would like you to explain the day-to-day situation for your forestry producers who are grappling with a single service provider.