There is a point in your presentation that, compared to the one presented by the Railway Association of Canada, struck me: you agree on the need for a review of the entire railway system within 30 days of the passage of the bill. The Railway Association of Canada says that there are no documents clearly outlining the position or the facts, so it is rather anecdotal. On your side, you invoke a number of arguments; it invokes others. So the association has confidence in the study, in the same way that you too believe it will be a good thing.
Do you think that ultimately, the solution or the conclusion of the study will perhaps come about through government involvement in rail transportation, or do you think that one side or the other should pick up the tab?