I understand the purpose is that, but I would suggest that the intended purpose would have a consequence that is not necessarily advantageous, in that it would restrict who actually could apply for the remedy. In fact, it would make it almost impossible for someone to receive the remedy.
I received an e-mail from Bob Ballantyne, who appeared before us. It's not in both official languages, so I'd like to read it, if I may, into the record. Is that possible, Mr. Chair?