This would be the case for a policy initiative. The different elements are described in a document in your binder. The only change to the act is to subsection 45(3.2), concerning the use of lands. It simply says that in the case of a port authority, the land could be for temporary use. It was a matter of clearly indicating the purpose.
Some port authorities have a strategy for this. They will use the land temporarily. However, in other cases, the use would be more or less permanent. As several committee members have already said, some port authorities lost the chance to acquire land because it was more sustainable to use the land for strictly private commercial interests. So it is simply to show port authorities that there are other possibilities, that they will be able to use the land temporarily in an appropriate manner, then in the long term, keep the land for the use of the port. The only change to the act is in clause 23 of the bill, to the proposed subsection 45(3.2), which is on page 11, I believe.