Maybe I can crystallize Brian's earlier question, because I want to come back to it. You've said the ports themselves have contemplated $1 billion worth of capital plans over the next five years. The proposed amendments here contemplate access to public dollars for that purpose. I think the question he was trying to get to, and maybe I'm wrong on this one, is whether that $1 billion that's contemplated over the next five years can be privately raised through increased borrowing limits.
Obviously you know what the projection is. We know what the anticipated changes are. Do they not have the capacity to privately raise that $1 billion over the next five years, or do they need access to public dollars?