Exactly. The issue is flexibility, notably the temporary use of some land as opposed to more long-term use. In fact, the entire bill revolves around that flexibility. You mentioned it with regard to loans, but that same flexibility also exists with regard to land. Right now, we have 200 leases on the territory, and the bill will allow some flexibility for the use made of that land, be it temporary or longer term.
On January 29th, 2008. See this statement in context.