Yes, I realize that the practice transcended two sessions. I was there for only one of them, and that's why I wanted to clarify what we were going to do. The clarification, I thought, was that the government member in that instance was going to be represented by the chair. There would be the chair and the two vice-chairs, and the parliamentary secretary and the other opposition member would be there for their input. But if there were an impasse, we wouldn't go to those two members; it would be the three table officers who would make the decision.
On February 3rd, 2009. See this statement in context.