Just to clarify, we would not want to comment on a specific case. I just want to make sure you know that we wouldn't want to comment on a specific case.
Jerry's comments were, broadly speaking, what would apply to a trainee with the amendments. Jerry is indicating that there was some uncertainty about who is a passenger and who isn't. The bill would clarify that a passenger is a passenger, and a trainee would not fall under the category of passenger.
It doesn't mean that if something happens to a trainee there would be zero dollars available. It just means that different coverage is available. There was this uncertainty about what is a passenger, and the bill would clarify that.
So I just want to clarify that we don't want to comment on a specific case. The comments are broadly about what the bill would do.