Let's discuss that. I am a lawyer, but I'm not an expert on the Federal Court rules. I have a proposal, which I've made, in terms of amending sections 139, 128, and 129, so you'd put more, call it substance, into the enforcement provisions. I'm going to take you through that so I can have your comments.
Specifically with respect to sections 128 and 129, if you look at the proposed legislation, it talks about a designated officer doing various things, including, essentially, making an order that the ship can't leave. So my suggestion, which I'd like you to comment on, is that we include section 139 and the maritime lien under these provisions so that a designated officer could restrict a ship from leaving.
The exact wording I have is about...but that's not the point, it's the theory behind it. We restrict the ship from leaving and then the designated officer makes known to the owners of the vessel, just as it is here in section 129, what's required in order to be released. And we can build in some provisions in terms of having to bring this before a judge for protections within a certain period of time. But in essence what we're doing here, before it's too late, is we're stopping the vessel from leaving, to be fair to the suppliers in Canada. Otherwise, you're having to sue; you have to go to court and you have to get a judgment, if you can find a judge. It could be a Friday, they may be leaving, there are no judges available, it costs money. This is faster, and I would suggest it could resolve most of the cases. But please comment.