Yes, there were extensive consultations with industry. There weren't extensive consultations with the public generally, in the sense of the individuals who utilize these services, because you can't have that kind of consultation with your average, ordinary Canadian. They did go to industry, and industry is basically the adventure tourism operators, and of course they're going to favour it because it removes them from the act and it gives them limitation of liability. The consultation was with their marine underwriters, who of course are going to favour it because it reduces any claims they have to pay.
Our position, and the position of the Canadian Bar Association, is quite different. We don't have any interest, and believe it or not, I have more than enough work. I don't need to try to create more work through this kind of a process. But, effectively, I think someone has to speak up for all those people who go out and buy tickets and who really don't have a voice.
That's one of the things I think the Canadian Bar Association is doing, and it's one of the things, certainly, that we're doing. It's putting forth basically the argument for someone who wants to participate in whale-watching or go on the Maid of the Mist, but wants to do so under circumstances that ensure some degree of safety and some acceptance of responsibility on the part of the operator. That's why we have the position we do.