I have two points.
I wasn't talking about the lien aspect. My earlier comments were solely about the adventure tourism aspect. I don't know that users were or even can be approached, because the general public doesn't have an association.
With respect to the lien, I'm not sure I totally understand your question. Some of our constituent members certainly have an interest in various aspects of the lien issue. It pretty much balances out. Some are interested in not having a lien and others want a lien. Some want a wide lien; some want a very narrow lien. We certainly were consulted, as were some of our constituent members, who I believe have also spoken before this committee.
The bottom line is that we have recommended what we think is a fair solution to what was a problem, one that address both the concerns of the suppliers, to have some protection and some assurance of being paid, and the concerns of the shipowners, that they not be required to pay amounts that, with respect to contracts, they haven't entered into or authorized.