What I understand the provision is for is specifically to remedy a situation that has developed under Canadian law because of the way in which conflicts of laws are dealt with under Canadian maritime law. Not to get into that, but the problem has been predominantly with respect to foreign vessels, not exclusively but predominantly. The lien addresses that issue. It addresses and fixes the big problem that's been experienced by Canadian ship suppliers.
Canadian vessels are here. They stay here. The owners are here. You have other remedies to recover what you're owed. With a foreign ship supplier, all you've got is the ship, and if the ship goes, then you're left with an action in Panama or.... You're really not left with any other remedies, so I suppose that would be the justification for it.