Okay, thank you.
Mr. Giaschi, while I appreciated your presentation and the responses you've given everybody, I was a little bit surprised at your reaction to my colleague Mr. Kania's suggested amendment, which I took to be offered as an indication of providing greater certainty and greater assurance for the user.
Your response, to me—I hope I'm reflecting it accurately—was an indication that you thought that all the measures were already in place and that, from a practical point of view, you or another reasonably competent lawyer would be able to provide service immediately by, I guess, bringing the ship to arrest, etc. But why should that happen? Why wouldn't you accept that the law, in becoming much more precise, would offer a guarantee that the user doesn't have to resort to a lawyer?
I heard you say something about a $300 price in order to get the thing going. Mr. Giaschi, I think lawyers probably charge less out in B.C. than they do in Toronto, but $300 gets me a phone call, to which somebody will respond five days later for about two minutes. I don't mean to be sarcastic, but you get my drift.
I hear Mr. Jean saying it takes $500 to get that call, but--