But, Mr. Giaschi, we have heard the shipowners. If they are not asking to be directly involved as having a direct link between the privilege on the debt or the amount due and the shipowner, why would you want to add this? My question dealt mainly with shipowners. I can understand you jumped on what was the easiest.
As a matter of fact, even with adventure tourism, we are told that there is some support from the industry and users. In other words, even users have been consulted by Transport Canada.
As concerns the maritime lien, however, you said that shipowners should get some protection, but shipowners are the industry. They have been met. If they did not see fit to make this request, I do not understand why you are making it today on their behalf.