I'd like to speak to that point.
Volenti non fit injuria, which shows my expression of Latin, means voluntarily assuming the risk, which is the case law in Canada. I'm someone who practised personal injury law and has his teeth marks in more ambulances across Alberta than probably any other lawyer.
That was a joke, by the way. I'm glad you see that.
So nobody can voluntarily assume gross negligence; that's what it comes down to. No one can waiver gross negligence. They can waiver negligence, but if it's found that the operator of the vessel is grossly negligent, the judge will throw out the waiver and say that no one will voluntarily assume that. Is that correct?