It does put a chill.
It comes back to the problem, though, that if in the interests of removing that chill you remove the waiver, then you're exposing the operator, in what is essentially a fairly risky activity, to a law suit that can put him out of business. The question is whether we want to have these businesses operating when the participants are knowingly and voluntarily engaging in it, knowing that there is an element of riskânow, with the caveat, of course, that the operator must ensure seaworthiness, he must have trained guides and outfitters, so certain basic minimum conditions are being met. You point to the dilemma, and it's hard to answer it.