Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Mr. Jones, for being here and sharing with us more information on this.
It seems that with this bill there's a fair bit of support for this section, but to some degree we seem to be running into definitional issues. What is an adventure tourism pursuit? What is risk? What is greater risk? These are things that are seemingly difficult to define in this bill because of giving exemptions.
Would it make more sense to have defined categories of activities? If you were to characterize all the water-based activities that could possibly fit under “significantly higher risk” to the passengers, over and above normal carriage, what activities would fit?