Mr. Chairman, we had some ongoing discussion with the legal experts who we brought before the committee about what needed to be done with respect to this component of the legislation. They suggested that we needed to make sure that we put down the word “significantly” in order to ensure that participants would not be exposed to the kinds of risks that they might not normally expect, notwithstanding the fact that they are in a risk-taking adventure exercise. In other words, if you put the word “significantly” in, then there is an incumbent responsibility imposed on the operator to ensure that there is a well-defined process and series of protocols for due diligence that can give the participant an indication that there are normal risks. Something that goes beyond those normal risks would have to trigger their access to the courts for indemnification.
So we're following that advice, and we thought we would make the amendment reflect that particular thinking.