I have an observation to make.
Mr. Gauthier, I'm glad you said what you did in response to my observation about this possibly being a policy issue rather than a fencing issue. Of course, what we're here to do is talk about legislation that represents government policy. The reason we referred to what other lawyers have said, lawyers who are apparently commissioned by the Bar Association to look at this particular act—and they provided you as well as us with their thinking on it--and those from the marine liability component of the practice of law, is that they said to us—and I hope I'm not misinterpreting or misstating their position—that what the act is trying to do is put some people into part 4 of the act, and we, on this side, may not be convinced that they ought to removed.
So you're right, it's question of policy. So we need not fence.
In terms of policy, this would be as valid a position as someone else's. It's a question of whether this is the one the group will accept. I think you're right on that score as well. Let me compliment you on two very good observations, and I leave your credentials in law untested by one who does not have them.