We can divide the concept into three parts—the civil engineering, the rolling stock, and the operation. The first two are infrastructure and would stay with whoever does the financing. That's why Mr. Haynal says you have to have government involved. The trains could always be full if you don't charge much to get on them. Is part of the feasibility study an effort to define the amortization costs to be recovered for all the parts and the ongoing maintenance, or is it just associated with rolling stock and ongoing maintenance?
On May 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.