To your first point, certainly an argument can be made. Theoretically, airlines could readjust aircraft to certain new routes, but I think that discounts the human factor. As I mentioned in my presentation, airlines represent 43,000 employees. Those are employees in places like Windsor, where having a commercial aviation industry is an important part of that town.
There would be a concurrent adjustment in employment levels and levels of economic benefit and cargo availability and ability to do a downline connection on the aircraft from Windsor, if one were to try to shift away from aviation and go to rail. I think that's certainly something that needs to be considered. We would certainly have a fleet that would no longer be appropriate and we would need to consider either stepping down or finding some way to reassign. You can't do that with a family.
To your second point, I don't want to leave here with the impression that our presentation dwelt on our problems with airports. I have a very real problem with the fees associated with those airports. Certainly there are ways the Government of Canada can look at the governance structure of airport authorities and ensure that the overbuild we've seen domestically can be avoided. From an operational perspective, there are drawbacks and advantages to all these things, and that's the kind of thing that needs a very concrete, long, integrated study. You're not just talking about airport authorities and airlines. You're really talking about involving Nav Canada, CATSA, and in certain cases, customs and security. I would caution against solutions that may work in one case, working across the board.