Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, gentlemen, for coming and sharing with us your perceptions on where this study is going and where it ought to go.
I'm wondering if I can begin with Mr. Facette, because he's the one who has to rush away.
Mr. Facette, I didn't hear you say that your association is against a high-speed train concept, because I think you used some key words here, that you were looking for a totally integrated and connected multimodal passenger system that would obviously include air travellers. The second thing you indicated is that what this country has been lacking for quite some time is a transportation strategy. I think you used the words “long overdue”.
That said, you did point to two other issues: one, the investments that your association has made over the course of 10 years, which are about $900 million a year; and secondly, that you don't want your productivity or your profitability hurt. I can respect both.
So I'm going to ask you something about one of your members, the GTAA. It currently has two terminals, quite large. One of them, I think, is underutilized. It was classic in its day, about 20 years ago, Terminal 3. I'm wondering whether your association has thought at all in terms of the perspectives that Mayor Rosen has brought to the table, and that is that they might want that particular terminal to be converted into a station for a high-speed rail that would provide immediate conductivity and total integration.