I guess we'll find out, but it would have been more apples-to-apples in comparing the study that was done in 1995, the kilometrage, etc.
Can I just clarify something? In the 1995 study and the 200-kilometre approach versus the 300-kilometre approach, not that $2 billion is different, but I think one was around $16 billion and the other was around $18 billion. Is the new study looking at both of those again as well, or is it...?