You say I've introduced them. I would hope that there were two stronger things I've introduced into this discussion. One is that you really have to have a sense of where the price of oil is going before you even begin to think about this. The second is that once you have that sense, then start with the premise that you want it to cost nothing in terms of subsidy, and work from that. That was my analysis. I put it in the context of the price of oil, and I said, what would it take to have a no-subsidy high-speed or higher-speed line? Then work back from there. I would hope those other two points are actually stronger than the details about the costs, which could very well be different for the circumstances we're talking about.
On June 9th, 2009. See this statement in context.