Thank you, Mr. Chair.
What you're hearing from the members are concerns about business practices. Most of us have been contacted, not just in terms of the current event but for information about the northern subsidy that you handle. Because the review has just happened at Canada Post, and there is some part of that review that speaks to some concern about the ongoing viability of Canada Post, we're trying to ascertain the kinds of practices that are being followed. You have close dealing like this in the sense that you have related corporations, and we're not able to get commercial information. So far this has been an exercise in our sort of taking your word that due diligence happened.
Given that the people of Canada are the shareholders, is there some other mechanism that could arise? I don't think anyone around the table wants to cast aspersions on either management or direction, but it's very hard to form an opinion on behalf of the shareholders, whom we represent in the accountability sense, as to whether or not Canada Post practices are all right.
You had a review. We have raised concerns like this. What do management and the board think should be available as mechanisms so that legislators can get assurances when they feel they need them? I think otherwise that this exercise is not that productive.