As a follow-up, do we have an understanding within our own government of the different levels of security clearance we might be looking at for, say, a truck driver of hazardous waste and somebody who makes fully responsible decisions that could move large quantities of hazardous waste around? Are there levels of that required, and do they correspond to other types of security or safety risks that are happening elsewhere?
Just to elaborate slightly on what Mr. Grégoire said, the reason is that there are people who want to have construction contracts, for example, with one part of government, and they find that the security clearances are completely different from what they are in another type of government, and they find this to be an enormous bureaucratic impediment. Now, there may be good reasons for this, but I'm wondering, within the Government of Canada, because you're introducing a new platform for security clearances, if this question is being addressed. Is it a legitimate concern on the part of outside agents as they encounter government, or is it just a misunderstanding?
You talked about cross-border a little more specifically than about cross-ministries and the different requirements we seem to have for people who deal with government to prove their security-worthiness.