Everything that we do is risk-based, so our intent is clear and our consultations were clear on how we were going to move forward with this particular provision. That would still be the way we would move forward. Granted, the authority is larger, and if there is a security risk that is determined that would require something larger, it would probably make sense for the Department of Public Safety to have the authorities to be able to do it.
We cannot unilaterally move to make any decision that would not be done through regulation and through wide consultation. So anybody who would have an impact because of that enlargement should there be a risk or a security concern would have an opportunity to be consulted on that prior to it becoming enforced.