Well, if they're trying to transport dangerous goods to the United States, they have to go through that process currently. The difference is that you're looking at repatriating back to Canada the appeals process that should you have an individual who was not granted a clearance under the FAST program and the Americans perhaps did not accept that particular candidate, there would be a process here that's been established by the department. It goes back to, as Mr. Grégoire talks about, the ports, but it also goes back to the Aeronautics Act in 1985, when you had security clearances that had come into effect.
We have a long history of dealing with security clearances for transport workers. The program would be based on the same. Granted, there could obviously be some difficulties for particular individuals. The notion is that there is an appeal process, and we'd be prepared to work with them to try to find the appropriate solution to make sure that nobody is unduly in difficulty because of the requirement.
The notion under the Aeronautics Act and others is that you're looking at a security problem or a security relationship in this bill to the transportation of dangerous goods. So you're looking at making sure an individual doesn't have something that would cause us concern in that field or scope.