There's a reason you've held office as long as you have, as you are very wise about what you say.
That's the conflict. It is between a passive part and an active part. It is the conflict between people who believe a park should be devoid of human participation and then there are others who feel that public participation brings the park alive. I think there is a balance in that.
I understand you have 1.7 million visitors to this park a year, so obviously there are corridors of activity and other areas that are set aside for environmental stewardship reasons. Is that part of your master plan?