I'm going to move on to another question.
As far as national parks are concerned—I am thinking of the one in Banff, because I studied it in an attempt to try and find something comparable—people talked about leases. That is to say that people who have private lands—and you must understand that there are not many—have leases. In that case, there can be no development, no further expansion, using that private land or private property situated within the park.
Would you support that approach, Mr. Garand?