When it comes to the master plan, could you maybe describe in a little more detail how that's going to work under Bill C-37?
I'm sorry if I'm asking things that may have been.... It's my experience with national parks that master plan changes are very slow and cumbersome. Now, you have a much more responsive master plan that you can adapt to the great responsibilities that you're given to interact with dynamic cities and communities, yet in following a plan that's set out over 50 years, you also have to respond to what these communities want and what they require for their own use within a very short period of time. How does that work with a master plan that's ongoing over that great length of time?