Yes, we did. Not to be overly convoluted, but support was linked to awareness and understanding of the issues. Frankly, education was a more important variable than income—income was important as well—and they were the ones who seemed more informed and had thought about the issue. I think one of the reasons we found that the less affluent and less educated hadn't really thought about it was because frankly it hadn't crossed their radar screen.
By the way, the travelling public we looked at, particularly those taking rail, air, and also bus, were really interested in moving over if high-speed rail were to exist. Car travellers were as well, but the interest was less pronounced. I think you have a lot of people on the roads who would be in planes or trains if they could afford it, so this was a factor.
Interestingly, some of the questioners at the conference pointed out that the experience with high-speed rail in the United States has been that some of the most important customer base are those of less affluent means—in other words, precisely the people in Canada who are not showing much attention to the issue right now.