They explained the perception that they are not profitable by the fact that somehow their costs and revenues are being lumped in with a money-losing business unit or something like that. In other words, for them it seemed to have been an accounting issue.
Why would they make that kind of statement? Have you studied their statement? Should someone not be writing to them to say that's not true, or there is evidence to the contrary? Where is this coming from? That calls into question the credibility of their entire presentation, really. So where is that contradiction coming from?