You've covered an awful lot of ground here, sir. With respect to the parliamentary procedures, I'm sorry, I'm not familiar enough with them to know what can and cannot be done. When I referred to possible alterations, I was thinking of a couple of very simple ones with respect to delays that would not necessarily make cancellation the default position but would perhaps clarify a situation with respect to delays. I am looking at perhaps minor modifications if they could indeed be made, if they needed to be made, but not to have the bill thrown out because of that.
We are not looking to penalize, which had been the thrust of your comments with respect to Cubana. This is an attempt to change behaviour. It's not an attempt to get at a particular airline or a particular situation such as Cubana. And I think the bill has been very well drafted and in a manner to attempt to change airlines' behaviour on behalf of Canadian consumers. The sort of circumstances that have been described, if we at least put the focus on the airlines, causing them to change their behaviour, if they have problems further back in the system, there is sufficient time for them to work with the other players in the system to help to resolve some of those problems before the fact.