Thanks.
I have a comment on costing. If you're adding a security blanket to the industry and the responsibility of Transport Canada is now not only for ensuring that you're following the safety procedures with hazardous goods but for ensuring that you're following the security procedures with hazardous goods, that is going to add burden to the transportation department as well if it's to continue to keep up the job it has to do. It's not a burden on you; I'm considering the burden on the transportation department to make sure everything is followed under the act as laid out.
The question I have, though, speaks to our having had witnesses in here, saying that in regard to the transportation security clearance—this is coming from our government officials—the discussions are on right now within the SPP process to come up with the regulations that are going to be enforced in Canada.
So, Mr. Benson, your suggestion that you're totally confident that the Canadian regulators will come up with decisions about the civil rights of Canadians, the privacy rights of Canadians, is actually not quite correct, because what we're doing is negotiating with another country to put standards of security clearance on our own people, and those standards have to meet what the Americans want. What they are asking us to do may not fit with what we would normally do for our citizens, so one transportation certificate or one security clearance certificate that requires putting an undue burden on somebody crossing the border, should that be applied to a Canadian within this country, would have an impact on his civil rights and liberties. Your suggestion of a single transportation security clearance doesn't seem to follow under that.