Thank you, Mr. Dhaliwal.
Clearly, that would probably be the teamsters more than any other group. It is easily foreseeable that one of our members could have to go to the airport in the morning, the port in the afternoon, and potentially cross a border in the evening, whether it's a dangerous good or something else.
It is simpler and easier for everybody in the long haul to have a one-stop shop on the security clearance. Another reason is that if I have to go to five committees, 14 hearings, and 14 different people to talk about a security model, fighting each one individually, it becomes both time-consuming for me and rather silly. It would seem much better to me if we had a model that we could all agree on, and then if we tweak a model, we tweak all the models. It might take time to tweak them, but we can tweak them all. If we're chasing four or five different models, that's not possible. As Mr. Kennedy raised, it's pretty hard for Parliament to oversee five or six different models, but I know you can oversee one.