I would just like to add my comments to it. I think the reality is that from the government's perspective it does have a good thought in principle, and indeed when a master plan is proposed, I think it's important for the public to comment across the country and for the public to have that opportunity, and certainly that is included within G-5. G-6 also includes the master plan, which will include principles and the objectives for the park and the greenbelt itself.
So we would be against this particular one, but we would suggest something similar later on in relation to, in particular, the annual reports and also its activities regarding Gatineau Park, so that the public would have an opportunity to comment, and indeed it would be reported to Parliament.
(Amendment negatived)