Some of us have been paying attention for the last 40 minutes as we've gone from one amendment to another to another in an attempt to clarify the two previous amendments and part of a third one. When I really focused, I thought Mr. Bélanger had made a suggestion of a friendly connection of a previous amendment to the Liberal amendment that would have covered our concerns. Would it be inappropriate for me to ask the chair to go back to Mr. Bélanger and ask him to present again what he had proposed? We could deal with it and then worry about amendment G-6.
On December 7th, 2009. See this statement in context.