Evidence of meeting #41 for Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was ncc.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Simon Dubé  Director, Portfolio Management, Crown Corporation Governance, Department of Transport
Philippe de Grandpré  Senior Counsel, Canadian Heritage, Legal Services, Department of Justice
André Morency  Assistant Deputy Minister, Corporate Management and Crown Corporation Governance, Corporate Services, Department of Transport

4 p.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

4 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

All right.

Monsieur Proulx.

4 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

Is there an opportunity for Mr. Jean to amend the amendment so that instead of an extra member, a 15th member, it could be specified in the bill that there is a casting vote for the chair? That would solve the problem of the 15...

4 p.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

[Inaudible--Editor]

4 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

That's right.

4 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

I would think if it's already in the bylaws--

4 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

Yes, but Mr. Chair, the bylaws can be modified as it pleases the board. We don't want that.

4 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Mr. Jean.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I just don't understand the logic. If two people don't show up, they still don't have everybody showing up, and if it's in the bylaws, it's already in the bylaws. I don't really understand what difference it makes, but if--

4 p.m.

Liberal

Mauril Bélanger Liberal Ottawa—Vanier, ON

The logic is quite straightforward. We tend to agree on this side with the notion of a preponderant vote for the chair, and if it's in the bylaws, then it stands to reason it could be in the law; therefore it remains in the law forever and the bylaws can't change that, so that in any situation, whether there are eight of them voting, twelve of them voting, six of them voting--although that might not be a quorum, so let's say eight or twelve or ten--as long as the chair has the preponderant vote, the matter is determined.

So that's fine and that works.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Mr. Chair, I'm wondering if this particular amendment could be put to the end. We could deal with it prior to the title, of course. We could get an amendment together that would reflect it appropriately, and then we can come to some sort of compromise on that. Would that be acceptable?

4 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

Sure.

4 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Maybe the clerk could advise us if it would affect any other thing as we go through.

4 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Mr. Bevington.

4 p.m.

NDP

Dennis Bevington NDP Western Arctic, NT

I think the amendment as proposed by the Liberals is not really worth anything. If we want to vote it down, then that's what's going to happen. The NCC has the ability to set its voting pattern with its bylaws. That's simple enough.

4 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Okay. Shall amendment L-1 carry?

(Amendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings])

BQ-1.1.

Monsieur Nadeau.

4 p.m.

Bloc

Richard Nadeau Bloc Gatineau, QC

Mr. Chairman, in the same letter referred to earlier written by Mr. Pelletier, dated October 16, he refers to minority representation for Quebec compared to Ontario on the board of the National Capital Commission.

So, the amendment was intended to ensure there was an equal number of board members from Quebec and from Ontario.

The fact that board members from Quebec would represent a minority compared to Ontario can absolutely not be justified given the effect that decisions made by the board would have an effect on the Outaouais region.

Consequently, we are asking for fairer representation.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Merv Tweed

Are there comments?

Mr. Jean.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

I'm just wondering if they could answer how many representatives have to be from Alberta. Are there any who have to be from Alberta or any other province besides Quebec and Ontario?

4:05 p.m.

Director, Portfolio Management, Crown Corporation Governance, Department of Transport

Simon Dubé

No. For the NCR, it's only Ontario and Quebec. For the rest, there's a number, eight people, who come from any region in Canada.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Can you advise us how many are actually from Quebec now who sit on the board?

4:05 p.m.

Director, Portfolio Management, Crown Corporation Governance, Department of Transport

Simon Dubé

Currently there are five people who are Quebec residents.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

And how many are from Ontario currently?

4:05 p.m.

Director, Portfolio Management, Crown Corporation Governance, Department of Transport

Simon Dubé

There would be three from the NCR, plus two, so there would be five.

4:05 p.m.

Conservative

Brian Jean Conservative Fort McMurray—Athabasca, AB

Can you advise us how these people are chosen and by whom they are chosen?