Yes, thank you. I understand, but I don't want you to misunderstand me. Nothing we are proposing here would in any way, shape or form limit the ability of medevac flights or any other kinds of flights to access the airports. That is simply not true.
This is not an exercise that's being driven by economics, in the sense that I think you were trying to express there. This is a routine reassessment of our levels of service, which is an ongoing process in the company and always will be. But the first consideration is safety. Nothing we're proposing here at any of these airports would in any way limit the ability of aircraft, including medevacs, to access them. And I would point out to the committee that there are literally hundreds of airports in this country at which we do not have any on-site services but which routinely handle medevac flights quite safely and without a problem. So that is not the issue here.