We most definitely do. We think that proposed section 27.1, which mandates the need for security clearance, is an important part of the bill. We fully support that. All we are asking is for some consideration on a definition of what a security clearance is. It's not defined in the act itself, it's not defined in the amendment, and quite honestly it's not really defined clearly in any piece of legislation in Canada.
Typically, legislation is written that requires some form of security clearance, but there is rarely any discussion in the regulations as to what's involved with a security clearance.