I'd like to concentrate a little bit more on the pollution prevention aspects of this particular amendment. We've seen some of the parks you've been involved with setting aside, some of the enlargements of those parks, some of the new ideas this government has had relating to the environment in Canada in setting those aside, including some of the ballast water legislation, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994—that came into force just before, but we're enforcing—and offshore patrolling through asset purchase and asset build, which obviously creates a lot of jobs.
What is the real effect of this, basically, from the environmental perspective, that you see with your background as the Minister of Environment for some time, in extending this 100-mile limit? Do you see that this will create a lot of animosity for the north, or a lot of positive benefits? Obviously those new patrol boats will create jobs. They will create more infrastructure. Do you see positive benefits from this ongoing for 100,000 years, or how do you see this going as far as the environment is concerned?