If I could jump into this, by no means should this act be seen as a job completed with respect to environmental protection in the Arctic. I think that's going to be an ongoing responsibility. We've got to continue, I think, to do more to ensure we don't make the same mistakes in the north as we've made in southern Canada and other parts of the world.
I do strongly believe there have to be more redundancies and requirements for shipping there, not to simply look at how we punish the bad actors, but at how we ensure, if there's a double or triple redundancy, that the accident doesn't happen in the first place. And whether that's a transportation vessel or a research vessel, whether we're dealing with diesel for propulsion purposes, whether we're dealing with safety of individuals, or whether they be crew or passengers, that is a concern.
An example is the whale sanctuary we did in Nunavut, an important part, because we have cruise ships beginning to get there. So this will be very much a work in progress, and we're certainly committed to do more.