I wonder if I could interject, because my time is limited.
I'm looking for some very specific things: industries that have been chosen and then some plans with respect to that.
The north has a particular challenge. I originally come from the near north, not the far north. I had a discussion when I was a visiting scholar at Ryerson University with the finance minister from Nunavut, and they were looking for our help to train their people to work on a deal with India around diamond polishing and so on. There didn't seem to be, frankly, an authority on economics. I would think this strategy would take a position vis-à-vis climate change the way some of the people are advocating.
For example, you have concerns, obviously, about the polar cap, but what needs to happen? What does southern Canada...and what indeed does a climate change strategy need to produce concretely to make a difference in terms of the integrity of the north?
I gather, by and large, things are happening much more quickly, disrupting traditional hunting patterns and so on much more quickly than anybody imagined. Have those things not transmitted down to specific, quantified outcomes that we're looking for on economic development and so on?
I think I understand the general relationships you're alluding to, and I'm sure the chairman wants to move on. Is there a specific document that gets down to the nitty gritty of where this government has put their foot down and said these are the things that will produce these kinds of results?
Discrete actions by themselves are not a plan. It's a question of what the outcomes are that we're trying to generate. Where do I find those outcomes? How do I know that the plan works? I can't judge it if there are no outcomes that we're shooting for.