It sounds likely, I guess, but what I worry about is this. How do you know that they're actually in sync, that you're going to deliver the mapping information in time to understand the impact of some of the undersea drilling, that you're going to have everything you need to know when that Mackenzie pipeline, as a deal, does come together? That's what I would expect, frankly, would be more concrete, more clear, and more available to us. I think we need to see that by 2009 there needs to be this kind of development. It needs to be complete and so on if this is a serious integrated plan. Is there even a budget that brings together all the money spent in the north and that says what their role is in producing these various outcomes?
Personally, as someone who previously served as a minister, I have trouble if I hear about a project here and a project there and there is nothing that brings them together. Is there even a way to tell how much money is being spent in the north? Is there something that DIAND pulls together? We heard you say they have signing authorities and so on. Does that get done? Is there an accountabilities outcome for the north like there is for some departments and ministries?