It's only on a rare occasion that I disagree with Mr. Jean, so I will take full advantage of the rarity and disagree with him.
I think the reason we spent the last 10 minutes going around the table was simply to establish--if I can recall the word--the “principle” of actually debating this in subcommittee with an interest of going forward for next week. It was to give the steering committee a sense of where everybody was at, not to make the decision in full committee, because we needed to do that in a fulsome discussion in steering.
Now, I didn't want to pre-empt that from taking place, but if Mr. Watson is going to be directed into a position where he would want his motion read, debated, and then voted upon right now, before we go into steering, then I guess we're going to have to engage in a fulsome debate on the motion that preceded his, which would of course be mine.
In the spirit of cooperation, I'm going to take Mr. Watson's reflection as an indication that all of us have heard sufficiently on the principle of that motion and can go immediately into steering committee to discuss the mechanics of what to do next week, and indeed what to do Thursday.