Mr. Laframboise, although we always agree, this time, I can only accept the first version, in which we “invite the committee.“ If the committee, in its wisdom, decides not to send all the members, it will be its decision—a decision of the other committee—not ours. So I prefer the original version.
But I accept what you are saying, Mr. Laframboise, about “relevant“ witnesses for this study, which does not exclude ministers.
I noticed that government members were saying yes or no. The only question that I am raising is simply that they accept this principle: the witnesses will be those the committee considers “relevant“ for the study; that means not excluding ministers right from the start.